1. The plaintiff's claims against the defendants are all dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

1. Basic facts

A. On October 7, 2010, Defendant D leased a deposit of KRW 10 million, KRW 600,000 per month, and KRW 600,000 per month from October 14, 2010 to October 14, 2015, with a opport franchise agreement with Korea Co., Ltd. (hereinafter “instant store”). Around that time, Defendant D entered into a opport agreement with the opport convenience store in its mother’s name, and operated the convenience store in the instant store (hereinafter “instant convenience store”).

B. On October 31, 201, Defendant E set the instant store from Defendant D with a deposit of KRW 5 million, monthly rent of KRW 600,000,000, and the sublease period from October 31, 201 to October 30, 201, Defendant E acquired and operated the instant convenience store operation right from Defendant D around that time.

C. On April 14, 2012, the Plaintiff entered into a sub-lease agreement with Defendant E to acquire all rights, such as goodwill and facilities, of the instant convenience store from Defendant E (hereinafter “the instant sub-lease agreement”). On July 1, 2012, the Plaintiff entered into a sub-lease agreement with Defendant D with the terms that the Plaintiff would transfer the instant store from Defendant D by setting the deposit amount of KRW 5 million, monthly rent, and the sublease period from July 1, 2012 to October 30, 2015 (hereinafter “the instant sub-lease agreement”).

[Ground of recognition] Facts without dispute, entry of Gap 1-4 evidence, purport of the whole pleadings

2. Judgment as to the main claim

A. The Plaintiff’s assertion 1) The Plaintiff’s claim is that the instant sub-lease contract and the right transfer contract (hereinafter collectively referred to as “each of the above contracts”) are combined with the instant sub-lease contract and the right transfer contract as a broker of Defendant C, an employee of Defendant C, a stock company I operated by

The Defendants conspired to conclude each of the contracts of this case, and the lessee is the object leased.