The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

1. When considering various circumstances against the defendant in light of the summary of the grounds for appeal, the punishment of the court below (two months of imprisonment and five hundred thousand won of a surcharge) is too unreasonable.

2. The judgment of the court below is acknowledged that the defendant is expected not to repeat again while recognizing all of the crimes, and that the defendant has grown in a poor family environment, and that it was difficult to support alone, etc. Meanwhile, the defendant has been punished twice for the same kind of crime (one time a fine, one time a penalty), and in particular, on October 15, 2009, the Seoul Southern District Court sentenced two years and six months to imprisonment with prison labor for the act of medication and smuggling import at the Seoul Southern District Court on July 19, 2012, again commits the same kind of crime during the period of repeated crime. Narcotics-related crimes need to be punished as serious crimes detrimental to society and the state soundness, and in the case of the defendant, considering the above like criminal records, the defendant's high risk of repeating crimes, age, character and behavior, environment, motive for committing crimes, circumstances, etc., the defendant's assertion that the court below's punishment is unreasonable is unreasonable.

3. In conclusion, the defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act on the ground that it is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.

(However, in the reasoning of the judgment of the court below, since "a prison labor choice" was omitted in the part of the column for the application of the law, it shall be corrected to add it to the last part of the judgment of the court below pursuant to Article 25 (1) of the Regulations on Criminal Procedure.