Defendant

In addition, the appeal by the person who requested the attachment order is dismissed.

1. Summary of grounds for appeal;

A. In the absence of a misunderstanding of the facts, the Defendant and the person who requested the attachment order (hereinafter the Defendant) to whom the victim stated that “I kn't kn't kn't kn't kn't kn't kn't kn't kn't kn't kn't kn't kn't kn't kn't or kn't kn't kn't kn't kn't kn't

B. The sentencing of the lower court is too unreasonable.

(c)

The court below's order to disclose and notify the defendant's information for a period of ten years, even though there are special circumstances that may not disclose the personal information of the defendant in violation of the disclosure and notification order.

(d)

In the absence of the risk of recidivism by sexual crimes, it is unreasonable that the court below orders the defendant to attach an electronic tracking device for a period of ten years, and imposes restrictions on outing and outing a specific time zone, such as night, on the defendant.

2. Determination

A. The following circumstances, which were duly adopted and examined by the lower court regarding the assertion of mistake of fact, are: (i) the victim did not have any person who followed the determination of the lower court by considering the following circumstances, i.e., “the victim was waiting for a taxi because he/she did not get out of the taxi.”

In that sense, the Defendant, as the Defendant appeared, threatened the victim with friendly acid by saving the left side of the victim, and speaking, “I will write the victim with a knife if he or she became aware of it.”

The defendant, who led the victim and parked the victim, taken the sexual organ into consideration by being sealed on the floor, and brought up the victim "at the time of release from the facility, the water can be cut off as soon as it can be seen, and the water can be cut off," while threatening the victim with a bad hand.

The defendant is a victim.