Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 700,000.

When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

Punishment of the crime

The defendant is a person who drives a two-wheeled automobile B.

1. On December 14, 2015, the Defendant driven the above two-wheeled vehicle on December 14, 2015, driving the D Hospital, which is located in Pyeongtaek-si C, into two-lanes in the direction of the sk small beauty apartment, and changed the course into one-lane.

A driver shall not change course when it is likely to obstruct the normal traffic of all vehicles running in the direction of the change, and even if the driver has a duty of care to change the lane safely by manipulating the direction, etc. in order to prevent the accident due to the smoke of the accident, the defendant, while neglecting the duty of care, failed to change the lane to the same right side of the victim E's FSM 5 vehicle running in the same direction as that of the victim E's driver's license, which is driving in the same direction as that of the driver's license.

After all, the Defendant damaged the above EM 5 car as the above occupational department and office, which is approximately KRW 500,000,000,000.

2. While no person is allowed to operate a vehicle that is not covered by mandatory insurance, the Defendant 1 driven the vehicle owned by the Defendant as described in the foregoing 1.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. A report on the actual condition of traffic accidents, and a report on the occurrence status;

1. Detailed details of the repair cost review;

1. Inquiry into mandatory insurance;

1. Application of each statute on photographs;

1. Selection of fines for facts constituting an offense, Article 151 of the relevant Act and the Road Traffic Act, Article 46 (2) 2 of the Guarantee of Automobile Damage Compensation Act and the main sentence of Article 8 (2) of the Guarantee of Automobile Accident Compensation Act;

1. The former part of Article 37 of the Criminal Act, and Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the same Act, which aggravated concurrent crimes;

1. Article 70(1) and Article 69(2) of the Criminal Act to attract a workhouse;

1. It is so decided as per Disposition on the grounds of Article 334(1) or more of the Criminal Procedure Act.