logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울남부지방법원 2016.08.25 2016가단4789
매매대금
Text

1. The Defendants shall jointly and severally serve as KRW 100,000,000 for the Plaintiff and as a result, from October 26, 2000 to February 2, 2006.

Reasons

1. The Seoul Southern District Court Decision 2005Da26529 Decided February 17, 2006, which became final and conclusive on February 17, 2006, requested an extension of the extinctive prescription period of the claim for the payment order (However, the Plaintiff withdrawn the lawsuit against D and E on July 21, 2016). 2. The judgment of deemed confession (Article 208(3)2 of the Civil Procedure Act, the Defendants were served with the original copy of the initial payment order, and the Defendants submitted a simple written objection without any content disputing the Plaintiff’s dismissal of the claim or the cause of the claim, and did not submit any subsequent written response, and did not appear at the date of pleading, and therefore, they were led to the confession of all the Plaintiff’s allegations under Article 150 of the

arrow