logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 광주고등법원(전주) 2015.09.24 2014나1978
공사대금
Text

1. Of the judgment of the court of first instance, the part against Defendant B in the judgment is modified as follows:

Defendant B Co., Ltd.

Reasons

1. Facts of recognition;

A. 1) The Plaintiff is registered as a business operator with the trade name of “F” and is engaged in the steel product construction, machinery facility pipeline construction, and G is the Plaintiff’s husband (hereinafter in this case, the Plaintiff is the Plaintiff’s husband for convenience unless the Plaintiff differs from G.

(2) Defendant B is a corporation that operates a steel structure, steel materials installation work, etc., and Defendant C is a subsidiary of Defendant B, a corporation that runs a steel structure, steel structure, steel bridge manufacturing construction work, etc.

B. A construction contract between the Plaintiff and the Defendants is 1) The Plaintiff and the Defendants: (a) supplied necessary human resources, equipment, etc. to the construction site that Defendant B performed; and (b) issued a tax invoice after settling the Plaintiff’s various cost and profit, such as personnel expenses and equipment costs; and (c) the main contents related thereto are as indicated below (hereinafter collectively referred to as “instant first construction contract”).

(3) The Plaintiff, 1, 20, 20, 30, 20, 20, 30, 20, 30, 20, 30, 20, 30, 20, 30, 20, 30, 20, 30, 20, 30, 20, 30, 20, 30, 20, 30, 30, 40, 20, 20, 30, 20, 20, 30, 20, 30, 30, 200, 20, 30, 30, 200, 30, 200, 30, 200, 30, 205, 208, 30, 205, 30, 205, 207, 305, 205, 2013.

arrow