Text
1. The plaintiff's claim is dismissed.
2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.
Reasons
1. The plaintiff's assertion asserts that the defendant was liable to return the above loan amounting to KRW 71,00,000,000 to the plaintiff as the interest rate of KRW 71,00,000 on July 26, 2007 (hereinafter "the loan of this case") by the lending company "C" with the introduction of "C" and C President D and E.
In this regard, the defendant asserts that all of the loans in this case were repaid, and even if not, the loans in this case were extinguished by the completion of prescription as commercial obligations.
2. We examine whether the instant loan claim has expired after the expiration of the commercial statute of limitations.
Claims arising from not only a claim arising from an act that has been engaged in a commercial activity but also a claim arising from an act that constitutes a commercial activity only for one of the parties also constitutes commercial claims to which the period of five years under Article 64 of the Commercial Act applies.
(2) In light of the legal principles as seen earlier, the following circumstances are as follows: (a) the Plaintiff and the Defendant appears to have received the instant loan from the lending company, i.e., the Defendant appears to have received the instant loan, and (b) the interest rate is considerably high as the lending company extended the loan; (c) the Plaintiff received the Defendant’s certificate of seal impression and identification card in addition to the instant loan loan loan loan loan loan agreement, and (d) the Plaintiff received the receipt, automobile transfer certificate, collateral, and vehicle waiver certificate with the Defendant’s official seal impression and identification card as well as the receipt, vehicle transfer certificate, and vehicle waiver certificate with the Defendant’s official seal impression as well as the document for securing the obligor’s personal information and acquiring the executive title as above.