logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 수원지방법원안산지원 2020.07.22 2019가단17324
손해배상
Text

The defendant shall pay to the plaintiff KRW 5,691,920 as well as 5% per annum from May 23, 2016 to April 13, 2020 and the next day.

Reasons

Comprehensively taking account of the overall purport of the arguments in Gap evidence Nos. 1 through 4, the defendant entered the Seoul Northern District Court on February 21, 2018, and "the defendant was a person without a certain occupation who works for a hospital as a medical assistant at the hospital, and does not intend to do so. However, around February 25, 2016, the defendant got access on the premise of marriage by misrepresenting the intent of the victim to the plaintiff who was known at "C", which is an Internet hosting site.

On March 6, 2016, the Defendant was not the Defendant’s intention, but the Defendant did not have the intent or ability to repay money from the victim, and even if he borrowed money from the victim, the Defendant’s false statement stating that “I will complete payment without the mold prior to marriage, if I would like to prepare for opening of the hospital in the vicinity of Seoul, because I would like to lend money due to the shortage of operating funds and opening of the hospital and operating funds in the vicinity of the G Hospital, the Defendant would receive five million won in money from the victim, namely, from the Defendant’s J bank account (K) to the Defendant’s J bank account (K).

5. Until December 23, 200, the sum total of KRW 47,680,000 has been paid over 18 times in the same manner as borrowing money.

On March 12, 2016, the Defendant was not the Defendant’s intention, but the fact in the Seo-gu Incheon, Seo-gu, Incheon. Even if the Defendant lent a credit card from the victim, the Defendant’s false statement to the Plaintiff that the Defendant believed to have the ability to pay the price, stating that “I would normally pay the price if I would be unable to use the credit card due to tax issues, and if I would lend the credit card, I would normally pay the price if I would be unable to use the credit card.” The Defendant received the L card and Ma card under the name of the Plaintiff from the victim and then

5. Until December 23, 200, an amount equivalent to KRW 8,011,920 has been used for a total of 61 times.

arrow