logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 광주지방법원 2015.11.11 2013가단36113
손해배상(자)
Text

1. The Defendant: KRW 56,559,540 to Plaintiff A; KRW 1,00,000 to Plaintiff B; and KRW 500,000 to Plaintiff C and D, respectively.

Reasons

1. Occurrence of liability for damages;

A. The facts of recognition 1) E is the F Truck on March 15, 201 (hereinafter “F Truck”).

(A) while driving a motor vehicle and driving a motor vehicle, while driving the motor vehicle and traveling along the motor vehicle of the motor vehicle of the plaintiff A (hereinafter referred to as the "victim") in the direction of the former motor vehicle, the motor vehicle of the motor vehicle of the plaintiff A while driving the motor vehicle of the motor vehicle of the

2) The lower part of the vehicle’s lower part is the front part of the damaged vehicle, and due to the shock, the damaged vehicle was subjected to a protective fence on the right side of the damaged vehicle’s direction, and the Plaintiff suffered injury, such as the Plaintiff’s failure to recover the recurrence of the earth’s abduction (hereinafter “instant accident”).

(2) The Defendant is a mutual aid business entity that entered into a mutual aid agreement with respect to a melting vehicle.

3) Plaintiff B is the wife of Plaintiff A, and Plaintiff C and D are children. [The facts that there is no dispute over the grounds for recognition, Gap’s evidence Nos. 1 through 4, 7, and Eul’s evidence No. 2, and the purport of the whole pleadings.

B. According to the above recognition of the defendant's liability for damages, the defendant is liable to compensate the plaintiffs for damages caused by the accident of this case.

다. 책임의 제한 피고는 피해차량의 운전석 부분이 손괴되지 않았는데도 이 사건 원고 A의 치아가 파절된 점에 비추어 원고 A이 이 사건 사고 당시 안전띠를 매지 않았다면서 그 부주의를 참작하여야 한다고 주장하나, 가해차량이 피해차량의 뒤 부분을 들이받아 그 충격으로 피해차량이 오른쪽 측면으로 방호울타리를 충격하면서 원고 A이 안전띠를 맸다고 하더라도 머리 부위를 차체에 부딪칠 가능성이 있어 피고가 들고 있는 사정만으로는 원고 A이 안전띠를 매지 않았음을 인정하기에 부족하고, 달리 이를 인정할 증거가 없으므로, 피고의 위 주장은 이유 없다.

2. Except as otherwise stated below in the calculation of damages, it shall be in accordance with the ratio of 5/12 per month and 5/12 per month in the separate statement of calculation of damages.

arrow