logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 대구지방법원 2017.04.28 2015가합200030
대여금
Text

1. The Defendant’s KRW 825,00,000 to the Plaintiffs and 5% per annum from January 17, 2015 to April 28, 2017, respectively.

Reasons

1. Basic facts

A. The plaintiffs are married couple who served as the representative director of the defendant who runs liquor wholesale business from April 2004 to April 2005.

B. The Plaintiff A’s punishment, from March 2007 to July 2009, and from May 2014 to May 201, is serving as the Defendant’s representative director.

[Ground of recognition] Unsatisfy, Gap evidence 1

2. The parties’ assertion and determination as to the cause of the claim

A. The parties' assertion (1) The plaintiffs are obligated to pay the plaintiffs total amount of 875,00,000,000 won and damages for delay on the ground that they lent the money borrowed from the plaintiffs' money or from a third party to the defendant and received promissory notes issued by the defendant (hereinafter "the Promissory Notes") as shown in the table below [Attachment]. Thus, the defendant is obligated to pay to the plaintiffs the total amount of the loans.

Not only the amount of 2-1, 15-1/6,00 A public space of 204/1, 15-1/11/8,000 B public space of 2-2, 15-5, 204/12/200, 2-3, 15-6 200 B public space of 2-4, 15-7 30, 15-7 2005/205/205/17, 205/10, 205/10 of the funds borrowed from 2-5, 205/205/10 of the funds borrowed from 0, 205/205/10 of the funds borrowed from 05, 205/205/7, 205/100 of the funds borrowed from 05/100 of the funds borrowed from 2-5, 205/75/105/7, 205/105/7.

(b) the fact that there is no dispute over whether a loan claim has been established or not, and if there is evidence No. 2, it shall include the number; hereinafter the same shall apply);

The defendant defenses that the bill of this case was forged, but it can be seen that the defendant's seal affixed to the evidence Nos. 8, 9, 10, and 11 and the defendant's seal affixed to the bill of this case are identical. Thus, the defendant's seal of the bill of this case is identical.

arrow