logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울서부지방법원 2018.06.05 2018고단63
사기
Text

Defendants shall be punished by imprisonment for four months.

However, from the date of the conclusion of the judgment, each of the defendants is against the defendants for one year from the date of the judgment.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

[criminal record] On June 13, 2013, Defendant A was sentenced to imprisonment with labor for a violation of the Act on Origin Labeling of Agricultural and Fishery Products at the Seoul Northern District Court, and the judgment became final and conclusive on November 19, 2013.

Defendant

B On November 28, 2014, the Daejeon District Court sentenced ten months of imprisonment for fraud at the Daejeon District Court, and the judgment became final and conclusive on July 2, 2015.

[2] On April 201, 201, Defendant B requested Defendant A, who is the manager of the KF (hereinafter “F”), to supply rice on credit in Yangju-si, and was refused. Defendant B, with the cooperation of Defendant A, received the cooperation from the joint business entity of the Rice Cooperatives Co., Ltd. in the transaction with Defendant A (hereinafter “victim”) in order to receive rice from F and receive rice, and Defendant A sent double 300 mills to “G” or “H” inasmuch as rice will be delivered from the victimized corporation.

In other words, the request was made.

Defendant

A knowingly accepted the request from Defendant B with the knowledge that the person who ordered rice due to credit problems, etc. was not F but Defendant B, but the person who ordered rice did not inform the damaged corporation of the fact that the person was Defendant B, and instead, did not notify the injured corporation of the fact that the person ordered rice was Defendant B, I want to receive the delivered rice from the victimized corporation.

Defendant

B The facts of around April 15, 201 do not have the intent or ability to pay the price even if the injured corporation received the rice from the injured corporation, and the fact is not that F orders the rice, but that F orders the rice, but the F orders the rice, and the F is an employee of the victimized corporation, “F 20km” to F.

450 F.m. false statement to the effect that the delivery to F.m. would promptly pay the F.m. price, and that f.m. 20 m. 16,875,000 U.S. market price on the same day from the victimized corporation.

450 Maz. F.

arrow