logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
arrow
(영문) 수원지방법원 안산지원 2018.03.09 2018고단229
전자금융거래법위반
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for four months.

However, the execution of the above sentence shall be suspended for a period of one year from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

Except as otherwise expressly provided for in other Acts and subordinate statutes, no person shall borrow or lend any access medium used in electronic financial transactions while receiving, demanding or promising the consideration therefor.

Nevertheless, the Defendant, around November 8, 2017, sent the Defendant’s text message to his mobile phone, “B Company C” from a person in the name of the Defendant who sent the Defendant’s text message to his mobile phone.

I would like to pay 600,000 won per day, 200,000 won per day, 300,000 won per day for the purpose of raising sales.

“After receiving and consenting to the proposal, at E stores located in Ansan-si, Seosan-si on November 9, 2017, through Kwikset Service Articles visiting to receive the physical card, he/she sent the physical card to his/her name in the name of the Defendant’s national bank account (F) and the Saemaul Bank account (G) and notified the password by text messages.

As a result, the Defendant promised to pay for the access media used in electronic financial transactions.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Statement made by the police with H;

1. Characters, merfinite photographs;

1. Application of statutes on the details of the Kakao Stockholm Games;

1. Article 49 (4) 2 and Article 6 (3) 2 of the Act on the Electronic Financial Transactions in the relevant Act concerning the facts constituting an offense (or choice of imprisonment);

1. It is so decided as per Disposition by the assent of all participating Justices on the ground that Article 62(1) of the Criminal Act (the crime of this case was damaged by the crime of this case, but the defendant does not have the same criminal record) is above

arrow