1. The plaintiff's appeal is dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

Purport of claim and appeal

The first instance court.

The reasons for this case are as stated in the reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance except for the following modifications. Thus, this case shall be quoted in accordance with Article 8(2) of the Administrative Litigation Act and the main text of Article 420 of the Civil Procedure Act.

In the first instance judgment of the first instance court, the Plaintiff asserted to the effect that “The No.4 was arrested on April 20, 2008 at the trial of the Party,” “The Plaintiff was arrested on July 23, 2009 while engaging in the activities at a university student organization opposing the Government, and was arrested on July 23, 2009 and detained for about three weeks, and that he was willing to report and escape from the Government’s act of murder, adviser, etc., on or around 2010,” but the Plaintiff did not specifically state such fact in the refugee recognition application and did not make any statement at all at the time of the refugee interview. It was difficult to easily understand that “The reason that the Plaintiff did not make such statement was “it was difficult to return it by means” merely because it was difficult to receive it.”

Therefore, the judgment of the court of first instance is just, and the plaintiff's appeal is dismissed as it is without merit.