logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 수원지방법원 평택지원 2016.06.30 2015고단1790
사기
Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of five million won.

If the defendant does not pay the above fine, KRW 100,000.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

On October 11, 2014, the Defendant is lacking operating funds to take over and operate the massage practice center to the victim C in Gyeonggi-do.

Along with a loan of KRW 10 million, one million was paid immediately on the date of borrowing money, and the remainder was paid in December, 12-month, and the remainder was paid without a mold.”

However, the fact is that the Defendant was working as the head of the massage procedure and did not intend to take over and operate the massage procedure, and it was not paid with the guidance, and thus could not receive the time limit money on December 201, 201. There was no particular income or property except the monthly pay 1.8 million won received from the head of the massage procedure office, and there was no intention or ability to pay the said money even if he borrowed the money from the person around April 201, because he was not 55 million won.

The Defendant was transferred to the Agricultural Cooperative Account in the name of the Defendant, after deducting KRW 1 million from the prior interest around October 11, 2014 from the damage.

In addition, the Defendant received, from October 11, 2014 to October 20, 2014, a total of KRW 2,50,000,00 from the injured party three times under the name of the borrowed money, as shown in the list of crimes in the attached Table, as well as from October 20, 2014.

Accordingly, the defendant was given property by deceiving the victim.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Statement made by the police against C;

1. A written confirmation of the details of transactions of deposit and withdrawal, and application of loan certificates statutes;

1. Article 347 of the Criminal Act applicable to the crime, Article 347 (1) of the Criminal Act, the selection of fines, and the selection of fines;

1. Article 70(1) and Article 69(2) of the Criminal Act to attract a workhouse;

1. The reason for sentencing of Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act, which has been subject to three times the punishment for fraud, and the crime of this case during the same crime is committed during the period of repeated crime, and the nature of the crime is not good.

However, the defendant agrees to pay some of the amounts and pay the remainder in installments.

arrow