Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 3,000,000.

If the defendant does not pay the above fine, the amount of KRW 100,000 shall be paid.

Punishment of the crime

The defendant is a person who is engaged in driving a CTB car.

On November 4, 2016, the Defendant driven the above car at around 07:30 on November 4, 2016, and made 343 sub-ages to the left turn to the south-gu office distance from the 343 sub-party to the south-gu office distance.

Since there is an intersection where signal lights are installed, the defendant engaged in driving service has a duty of care to reduce speed and drive safely according to good faith.

Nevertheless, the Defendant neglected this and received the front part of the EM5 si operated by the Defendant at the right side of the passenger car of the Defendant, which was driven by the victim D ( South, 61 years old) who was straight from the long distance of the sublim market to the long distance of the sublim market by a negligence in violation of the signal.

Ultimately, the Defendant suffered injury to the victim D, such as a ductal of the ductal part in need of treatment for about four weeks due to such occupational negligence, and injury to the victim F, who was on the si in the si in need of treatment for about four weeks, and the ductal part of the floor and the ductal part of the ductal part in the si in need of treatment.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Statement made by the police against D;

1. A written statement;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes of each written diagnosis;

1. Article 3 (1) of the Act on Special Cases concerning the Settlement of Traffic Accidents, the proviso to Article 3 (2) 1 of the Act on Special Cases concerning the Settlement of Traffic Accidents, and Article 268 of the Criminal Act concerning criminal facts;

1. Articles 40 and 50 of the Criminal Act of the Commercial Competition;

1. Selection of a selective fine for punishment (the following favorable circumstances):

1. Articles 70 and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act to attract a workhouse;

1. Circumstances unfavorable to the reasons for sentencing under Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act of the Provisional Payment Order: The circumstances favorable to the Defendant committed the instant crime in violation of signal: the Defendant is aged and there is no record of punishment exceeding the fine; the Defendant’s vehicle is covered by comprehensive insurance; and the Defendant’s character and conduct, environment, means and consequence of the commission of the crime, etc. are revealed in the pleadings of the instant case, such as the circumstances after the commission of the crime.