logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 대전지방법원 2015.04.15 2014가합105640
전부금
Text

1. The plaintiff's claim is dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

Reasons

1. The following facts may be recognized by comprehensively taking account of the respective descriptions of Gap evidence Nos. 1, 2, and 3 and the purport of the whole pleadings:

On April 19, 2010, based on the payment order issued by this Court No. 2010 tea2833, March 19, 2010, the Plaintiff received the attachment and assignment order of the claim for KRW 431,073,30, out of the construction cost claim against the Defendant of this Construction Co., Ltd., by order No. 2010, Apr. 19, 2010.

B. On April 22, 2010, the above assignment order was served on the Defendant, a garnishee, and became final and conclusive around that time.

2. The Plaintiff asserted the existence of the claim for construction price against the Defendant, which is the entire claim under the above assignment order, and sought the full payment to the Defendant. However, there is no evidence to prove the existence of the claim for construction price under the above assignment order.

3. In conclusion, the plaintiff's above claim is dismissed as it is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.

arrow