logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
Text
Reasons
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 인천지방법원부천지원 2014.07.09 2013가단26496
손해배상(기)
Text

1. The plaintiff's claims against the defendants are all dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

Reasons

1. Facts of recognition;

A. On April 12, 2013, the Plaintiff entered into a lease agreement with Defendant B, setting forth a deposit of KRW 10 million for KRW 10 million, monthly rent of KRW 1100,000,000, and period of lease from April 16, 2013 to April 15, 2014.

B. Around June 26, 2013, the sewage control in the corridor of the instant building was prevented, and around June 27, 2013, around 21:20, around 515, the sewage was flowed through the sewage outlet of the main kitchen, and the living room, etc. referred to in 515 was 10cm in sewage.

(hereinafter referred to as “the flood accident of this case”)

Accordingly, the plaintiff is the defendant us management corporation (hereinafter referred to as "defendant company") responsible for the management of the building of this case.

A) Around 01:00 on June 28, 2013, D demanded employees D, etc. to take measures to block sewage stations. D, at around 01:0, the water drained from a kitchen sewage outlet and a toilet into a toilet sewage outlet, but it was not completely prevented from flowing water into a toilet sewerage outlet. At around 02:00 on the same day, E of the Defendant Company arrived at 515, and left the site and left the site. Since then, around 16:00, the Defendant Company discontinued water pipes connected to each household of the instant building through the construction company, and 5:15 of the instant building, and there was no dispute as to whether the water flows into a toilet sewerage outlet (hereinafter the same shall apply). The Defendant Company was 5:00, and there was no dispute over the number 6:515 of the instant water station (hereinafter the same shall apply).

3.3 5 1 1 1 1 1 1

2. Determination as to the claim against the defendant B

A. According to the above recognition of the cause of the claim, Defendant B, a lessor, is necessary for the Plaintiff, a lessee, to use and benefit from No. 515, the object of lease.

arrow