1. The lawsuit of this case shall be dismissed.

2. The costs of retrial shall be borne by the plaintiff.

purport, purport, and.

1. The following facts are apparent in the records of the judgment subject to a retrial:

On September 20, 201, the Plaintiff: “Around 2002, the Defendant admitted approximately 76m2 (23m2) out of 863m2 (hereinafter “B”) owned by the Plaintiff as a road site without the Plaintiff’s land use. Therefore, the Defendant is obligated to pay to the Plaintiff KRW 2,300,000 (10,000 per square meter x 23m2) for land expropriation costs; (a) the Plaintiff was formed a slope on the boundary of the farmland and B and on the boundary of the land; (b) the Plaintiff was unable to enter the said land as the Plaintiff’s 19m2, which was owned by the Plaintiff; and (c) the Plaintiff’s 23,760,000 square meters of land, which was owned by the Plaintiff; and (d) the Plaintiff’s 3m3m2, which was owned by the Plaintiff’s farmland and its neighboring land; and (d) the Plaintiff’s 20m3m2, which was not owned by the Plaintiff’s farmland.

On the sole basis of the statement No. 4, it is insufficient to recognize the fact that the farmer, who was possible prior to the confirmation construction of the farmland in this case, has become impossible due to the remarkable aggravation of accessibility from the farmland in the farmland in this case due to the construction of the farming road in this case, and there is no other evidence to acknowledge it otherwise.

The plaintiff is the defendant.