Defendant

A Imprisonment without prison labor for eight months and for eight months, respectively.

, however, 2 years from the date of this decision.

Punishment of the crime

1. Defendant A is a person engaging in driving of a taxi for D business purposes.

On August 28, 2014, at around 21:22, the Defendant proceeded at the speed of about 60km/h of speed in the speed of 81km/h of speed, depending on the one-lane between the two-lanes in the direction of the Hanam Industrial Complex from the Hanam Industrial Complex.

However, since there is a private street intersection and a place where signal lights are installed, a driver of a motor vehicle is obliged to drive the motor vehicle in accordance with his/her signals, ensure that he/she well sees the right and the right and the right and the right and the right and the right and the right and the right and the right and the right and the right and the right and the right of operation

Nevertheless, the Defendant did not discover the victim G (Nam, 23 years old) who gets a path along the crosswalk in the direction of the Friju station in the lower-west 2 area by neglecting the signal and driving over the speed limit as it is, even though the signal of the front intersection was red signal, and did not find out the victim G (Nam, 23 years old) and received the victim from the front part of the said taxi.

The Defendant got the victim from the above occupational negligence to suffer approximately six weeks of medical treatment. In addition, the Defendant caused the victim to suffer two frameworks in need of medical treatment.

2. Defendant B is a person engaged in driving a taxi for H business.

On August 28, 2014, at the end of 21:22, the Defendant proceeded along four lanes in front of the Friju station in Gwangju Mine-gu, according to the direction of the Hanam Environmental Hospital in the direction of the Hanam Environmental Hospital. On the ground that A was giving a warning to the Defendant immediately before the error in the above place, the Defendant changed the course of the taxi he driven by the Defendant to two-lanes where A was driving, and as A was changing the course of the taxi to one-lane by avoiding it, A was driving the above brake system.