The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

1. The summary of the grounds for appeal is that the defendant does not have the head of the victim C in each item, and the victim is faced with the head of the nearest tree while the defendant was punished for trial expenses.

Nevertheless, the judgment of the court below which convicted the charged facts of this case is erroneous by misunderstanding the facts and affecting the conclusion of the judgment.

2. In full view of the following facts acknowledged by the evidence duly admitted and investigated by the court below, the court below did not err in misunderstanding of facts as alleged by the defendant, since the defendant was found to have inflicted bodily injury upon the victim's head by each item.

Defendant’s assertion is without merit.

On February 16, 2013, the defendant and the victim C have proved to be a job-place issue of a brupted dump in the North beach located in the north-gu 2 Dong-dong at the port on February 16, 2013.

At the time, the police investigation began due to the reporting of the victim.

On February 16, 2013, when the police investigation was conducted on February 16, 2013, the victim stated to the effect that “the defendant was at the time of the incident, while moving the location of a street store, destroyed the victim’s brucated bamboo display stand, and the victim was pushed down by tightly cutting down the neck, and the defendant was pushed down once again, and the head was fladd by flading the head by flading the flag on the left hand of the defendant.” The victim stated to the effect that “the head was flad by flaging the head by flading the flag.”

On February 27, 2013, the police stated to the same effect as a suspect even when he/she was investigated as a suspect.

On February 16, 2013, witness D stated to the police that “the defendant cited 1 each flag and assaulted 1 head part once, and the victim’s neck was injured and the other credit was not deemed to be the other credit.”

On March 5, 2013, the agreement between the defendant and the victim was submitted to the police.

On March 6, 2013, the police officer in charge of the instant case used the victim's assault.