The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

Expenses for appeal shall be borne by the defendant.

Purport of claim and appeal

purport.

1. The reasoning of the judgment of this court citing the judgment of the court of first instance is that “5,792,90,000 won for the purchase price of 10,357 square meters for the 5,179 square meters” at the second bottom of the judgment of the court of first instance shall be deemed “31,58,850,000 won for the total purchase price of 10,357 square meters for the 10,357 square meters for the 10,357 square meters for the 10,000 square meters for the 10,357 square meters for the 10,000 square meters for the 1

(The grounds for appeal by the Defendant are not significantly different from the allegations in the first instance court, and according to the evidence submitted by the first instance court, the fact-finding and judgment of the first instance court are recognized as legitimate).

A. The Defendant asserts to the effect that the instant meeting and the official document dated October 16, 2018, and December 4, 2018, were merely given and received with the intent to express his/her intent at the consultation stage for waste disposal costs, and that if the content is recognized as the Defendant’s liability for waste disposal, the Defendant merely expressed his/her intent to pay the waste disposal costs and did not agree to pay 80% of the waste disposal cost finally regardless of whether he/she is responsible.

However, according to the above circumstances and each of the above public questions, the defendant clearly stated the purport that the cost of disposal is planned after verifying documentary evidence at the time of the plaintiff's claim for the cost of disposal. Furthermore, the defendant's request for additional disposal by selecting waste and earth and sand and requesting the defendant to take measures so that the waste can be taken out after checking the quantity and the defendant's responsible person, and the plaintiff's additional disposal request official document (Evidence B No. 1) or the waste release collection sheet (Evidence B No. 3) examined by the defendant can be considered to be related to the scope of the cost of disposal on the premise that the defendant's payment of waste disposal costs is based on the defendant's payment of the cost of disposal. The reasons why the above public notice was given and received, the plaintiff's measures and claims for