1. The Defendant: (a) KRW 302,558,272 to Plaintiff A; and (b) KRW 39,152,915 to Plaintiff B; and (c) respectively, from February 1, 2017 to January 1, 2019.

1. Details of ruling;

(a) Outline of the project - Project name: Housing site development project (CPlanning zone) - Project operator: Defendant, etc. - Project approval: D public notice by the Ministry of Land, Transport and Maritime Affairs on May 30, 2008;

B. The Central Land Expropriation Committee’s ruling on expropriation on December 8, 2016 (hereinafter “instant expropriation ruling”): The date of expropriation: Each land listed in paragraph (1) of the attached Table 1 of Land List owned by the Plaintiff (hereinafter collectively “instant land”) and each land listed in paragraph (2) of the attached Table 1 owned by the Plaintiff in attached Table 1 owned by the Plaintiff (hereinafter collectively “instant land”), and each land listed in paragraph (2) of the attached Table 1 of Land List 1 owned by the Plaintiff (hereinafter collectively “instant land”): Compensation for losses: ① the instant land: KRW 1,78,908,050; ② the instant land ② KRW 413,094,260 [the instant land ② KRW 413,753 square meters; KRW 753 square meters; KRW 1,661 square meters; and each of the instant land collectively collectively “each of the instant land”.

(2) Each amount of compensation for loss shall be as stated in the separate sheet of compensation in attached Form 2 (hereinafter “appraisal of expropriation”) (hereinafter “appraisal of expropriation”)

C. The Central Land Tribunal rendered an objection on August 24, 2017 (hereinafter “the instant objection”): Compensation for losses: ① the instant land (i),793,189,250 won; ② the instant land (the amount of compensation for each of the instant lands is indicated on the appraisal column of the instant appraisal”) KRW 416,594,480 (the amount of compensation for each of the instant lands is the same as indicated on the appraisal column of the instant appraisal) (hereinafter “the appraisal column of the instant appraisal”) (hereinafter “the appraisal”) in the attached Table 2 List; hereinafter “the same shall apply) [1] the area of the land classification and appraisal condition applicable to the appraisal of the land category in the number of Pyeongtaek-si and 4,753279,501,501, 328, 701, 1502, 1,661, 273, 9605, 5760,560

D. The court’s appraisal of each of the lands of this case in the case where the situation of the use of each of the lands of this case is “electric” or “water sources” (hereinafter “court appraisal”) is without dispute, Gap evidence 1, Eul evidence 1, and Eul evidence 2 (including each number; hereinafter the same shall apply), and appraiser G.