A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for six months and by a fine of 500,000 won.

If the defendant fails to pay the above fine, 50.

Punishment of the crime

On August 12, 2011, the Defendant, at the Seoul Central District Court, sentenced the Defendant to attach an electronic tracking device for one year and three years of imprisonment for quasi-indecent act by compulsion, and completed the enforcement of the above imprisonment on June 21, 2012, and attached the location tracking device. On October 25, 2012, the Suwon District Court added the Defendant to the Defendant on October 25, 2012, “The Defendant did not drink alcohol level of at least 0.05% during the period of installation of the location tracking electronic device, and complied with the lawful drinking measurement by the probation officer.”

The defendant who has attached a location tracking electronic device shall not interfere with its utility by means of charging, carrying, and managing the location tracking electronic device so that the function of the electronic device can be maintained normally, separating the location tracking electronic device from his/her body in mind, and shall not drink alcohol with at least 0.05% of alcohol content.

1. On July 15, 2012, the Defendant, around 07:11, went out without carrying a portable tracking device on the 6th floor (D) of the Yeongdeungpo-gu, Suwon-si, Suwon-si, and thereby harming its utility.

2. On August 28, 2012, the Defendant, at around 03:02, went out without carrying a portable tracking device at the same place as the foregoing paragraph 1, thereby undermining its utility.

3. On September 25, 2012, at around 01:17, the Defendant: (a) did not carry a portable tracking device with a portable tracking device installed in a taxi in an irregular area of not more than 01:17, Seoul Metropolitan Government E; and (b) had the effect of a female.

4. On October 19, 2012, the Defendant did not charge a portable tracking device at the same place as the above 1:52 on October 19, 2012, thereby undermining its utility.

5. On November 9, 2012, at around 00:17, the Defendant did not charge a portable tracking device at the same place as the foregoing paragraph 1, thereby undermining its utility.

6. Around 08:00 on January 3, 2013, the Defendant did not charge a portable tracking device at the same place as the foregoing paragraph 1, thereby undermining its utility.

7. On January 15, 2013, the Defendant portable at the same place as the foregoing paragraph 1, around 04:28.