logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 청주지방법원 2015.07.03 2015노427
교통사고처리특례법위반
Text

The judgment of the court below is reversed.

Defendant shall be punished by imprisonment without prison labor for one year.

Reasons

1. The sentence imposed by the lower court (two years’ imprisonment without prison labor) on the gist of the grounds of appeal is too unreasonable.

2. The instant crime is an accident in which the Defendant, while driving a vehicle, was in violation of the vehicle stop signal while driving the vehicle, and the victim, who was standing the crosswalk pursuant to the pedestrian signals, was taken into account as the Defendant’s vehicle.

As a result, the victim faced with the front glass of the defendant and caused the death of the victim due to brain damage. The degree of illegality and the result is serious.

At the time, the victim, who was standing a crosswalk in a normal pedestrian signal, has caused a fatal consequence that caused the young age to lose a fluorial bath, due to the crime of this case, and it is difficult to measure the serious mental suffering of the bereaved family members.

In addition, considering the fact that the defendant has been subject to punishment several times prior to the crime of this case, such as drinking driving, driving without license, etc., and that there is still no agreement with the bereaved family members of the victim, it is necessary to strictly punish the defendant.

However, the defendant seems to have committed the crime of this case in a depth.

Moreover, the Defendant reported the instant case directly to 119 and actively endeavored for the relief of victims, such as providing cardiopulmonary resuscitation to the victim, after committing the instant crime.

In addition, at night, it was difficult for the victim to find it difficult because the surface was sucked by sucking down in the damp season, and the victim could have been able to find it difficult due to the victim's clothes in the color system; the defendant was loaned KRW 10 million for the recovery of the victim's damage due to the fact that the defendant was in an economic difficult situation and deposited for the recovery of the victim's damage; part of compensation with liability insurance covered by the defendant; and the victim was admitted to the victim.

arrow