logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 창원지방법원 진주지원 2016.05.24 2016고단311
사기등
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not more than ten months.

However, the execution of the above sentence shall be suspended for a period of two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

On May 13, 2015, the Defendant was sentenced to two years of imprisonment with prison labor for fraud in the Changwon District Court's Jinju branch, and the judgment became final and conclusive on the 21st of the same month.

1. On November 29, 2013, when purchasing a second class vehicle at a maintenance factory located in Sacheon-si on November 29, 2013, the defrauded Defendant would pay 543,637 won in monthly installments in the amount of 36 months from December 20, 2013 to November 20, 2016 as the principal and interest of 543,637 won in equal installments.

1. The second and second financial agreements were made to the effect that “..........”

However, the defendant had no property at the time, and his personal debt was about 50 million won, and even if he received a loan from the injured party due to no particular income, he did not have the intention or ability to repay the loan even if he purchased the above vehicle.

After all, the defendant deceivings the victim as such and obtained a loan of KRW 17 million from the victim on the same day.

2. On December 3, 2013, the Defendant: (a) purchased a vehicle with B seen from the date and place specified in paragraph (1); and (b) obtained a loan of KRW 17 million from the victim Don Capital Co., Ltd. (former Social Co., Ltd.) with the purchase fund; and (c) made a registration of establishment of a mortgage equivalent to KRW 8.5 million for the said vehicle owned by the Defendant.

From January 2014, the Defendant: (a) even though the Defendant was unable to repay the Defendant’s loans as agreed upon; (b) on February 2, 2014, in front of the fire station in Jinju-si, Jinju-si, which was the object of the right to collateral security against the victim; (c) provided the said vehicle as the object of the right to collateral security against the victim to transfer it as collateral to the Defendant’s name and injury (so-called so-called “C”); and (d) obstructed

Summary of Evidence

1...

arrow