Defendant shall be punished by a fine not exceeding five hundred thousand won.

Where the defendant fails to pay the above fine, one million won shall be the one day.

Punishment of the crime

On November 8, 2018, the Defendant: (a) was a person working as the team leader at Jeju-si BContact; and (b) on November 8, 2018, around 04:55, the victim C (the age of 52) who is the team leader at the first floor of the Contacdo, did not have personnel to report the Defendant, who is the team leader; (c) was injured by the victim’s right hand hand; and (d) during the process of taking the victim’s back, the victim suffered injury, such as the impairment of the character of the hand, which requires approximately two weeks of treatment.

Summary of Evidence

1. A statement made by C in this Court;

1. Statement C in the suspect interrogation protocol (C and comparison) dated May 27, 2019 against the defendant prepared by the police;

1. Some statements of the suspect interrogation protocol prepared on March 6, 2019 against the defendant prepared by the police;

1. Statement made by the police officer C on the statement; and

1. Entry in a petition filed by C;

1. Determination as to the assertion by the defendant and his defense counsel of each investigation report (the counter party identification of the victim's standing photo / the submission of relevant data to the complainant) and each video (including attached documents) on police preparation

1. The summary of the argument is that the Defendant only saw the victim’s arms in order to divide the dialogue with the victim at the time of the instant case, and the victim did not suffer any injury.

Therefore, at the time of the instant case, the Defendant did not have the intention of assault, and the Defendant’s act of taking the arms of the victim intending to divide conversations constitutes acts that do not violate the social norms.

2. On November 5, 2018, the following facts and circumstances acknowledged by the evidence duly adopted and investigated by this Court, namely, ① the victim was aware that the phone call was cut after the phone call was called with the Defendant, and the Defendant was aware that the phone was cut, and then the Defendant was able to take the bath. ② However, the Defendant was able to find out and talk at the victim’s accommodation from time to time of the occurrence of the instant case from time to time of the occurrence of the incident.