1. On February 17, 2014, at around 17:28, 17:28, a taxi driven by C in Seoul, Jung-gu, Seoul, the Republic of Korea.

A principal lawsuit and a counterclaim shall be deemed simultaneously.

1. Occurrence of liability for damages;

A. 1) C is a cab for business use (hereinafter “instant vehicle”) around 17:28 February 17, 2014, around February 17, 2014.

3) The Defendant, who driven the vehicle and driven the vehicle, driven the front road of the Seoul Jung-gu Seoul Southern-ro 3 moving the road in front of the Bank of Korea to the southwest-ro 5km (hereinafter referred to as the “instant accident”) and driven the road in front of the Bank of Korea at a three-lane speed from the southwest-ro gate to the southwest-ro gate. The Defendant, who started to walk the crosswalk due to a change in the pedestrian signal of the Mapo-gu crosswalk, was shocked toward the right-hand side of the instant vehicle

(2) The Plaintiff is a mutual aid business entity that entered into a mutual aid agreement with respect to the instant vehicle. The Plaintiff is a mutual aid business entity that entered into a mutual aid agreement with respect to the instant vehicle.

[Ground of recognition] Facts without dispute, Gap evidence Nos. 1-4, Eul evidence Nos. 1, 2, and 3 (including each number; hereinafter the same shall apply) and the purport of the whole pleadings

B. According to the recognition of liability and the recognition of the above limitation, the Plaintiff is liable to compensate the Defendant for the damages caused by the instant accident as a mutual aid business operator of the instant vehicle.

However, according to Gap evidence No. 4's video, the defendant was shocked to the vehicle of this case that had entered a rapid speed compared to other pedestrians without examining the surrounding condition of the pedestrian signal, and continued at a rapid speed compared to other pedestrians. This negligence by the defendant was caused by the occurrence of the accident of this case and the expansion of damages. It is reasonable to view the defendant's negligence to exceed 10% in light of all the circumstances, such as the background leading up to the accident of this case, the collision level, and the defendant's injury level and degree. Thus, the plaintiff's responsibility is limited to 90%.

2. In addition to the matters stated below within the scope of liability for damages, each corresponding item of the annexed Schedule of Calculation of Compensation, and the period for the convenience of calculation shall, in principle, be calculated on a monthly basis, but less than the last month and less than KRW 1 shall be discarded.