logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 광주지방법원 2016.05.13 2016고단1072
상습절도
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for one year.

Seized evidence 1 or 2 shall be confiscated from the accused.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

On September 2, 197, the Defendant was sentenced to imprisonment with prison labor for a maximum of ten months and a minimum of six months, imprisonment with prison labor for habitual night intrusion larceny at the Gwangju District Court on September 2, 197; imprisonment with prison labor for one year and six months at the Gwangju District Court on May 7, 1981; imprisonment with prison labor for habitual night intrusion larceny at the Gwangju District Court on March 31, 1987 for one year and six months; and imprisonment with prison labor for a violation of the Act on the Aggravated Punishment, etc. of Specific Crimes at the Gwangju District Court on October 21, 198; imprisonment with prison labor for a violation of the Act on the Aggravated Punishment, etc. of Specific Crimes at the Gwangju District Court on June 21, 197; and imprisonment with prison labor for a period of one year and six months at the Gwangju District Court on May 16, 200; and imprisonment with prison labor for a violation of the Act on Specific Crimes at the Gwangju District Court on June 21, 2002>

On March 15, 2016, at around 13:55, the Defendant opened a house in the Dong-gu Seoul Metropolitan City, Gwangju Metropolitan City, and entered the house of the victim D, which was not locked, and then intrudes into the main entrance of the bank by incidental Raber, with the main entrance, and then, in cash, 1.3 million won, including 70,00 won, 50,000 won, 40,000 won, 70,000 won, and 12,000 won, in the case of the victim’s wall located in the inside of the inside.

They have been cited.

Accordingly, the defendant habitually stolen the victim's property.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Records of seizure and list of seizure of police statements made to E;

1. Data of photographs from the scene of damage caused by the D's written statement;

1. Previous convictions: Investigative inquiries about criminal history, investigation reports (the same type and confirmation of criminal records for repeated crimes), and copies of each judgment;

1. Habituality of the judgment: The records of the previous crime, including theft by opening the entrance door through the Raber, even though each of the crimes of this case was committed once, there are many records of the judgment, and the methods and methods of the crime.

arrow