(영문) 청주지방법원 충주지원 2014.07.24 2014고합33

beta

본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.

Text

Reasons

텍스트 조절

글꼴

크기(pt)

굵기

줄 간격

자간(%)

(영문) 청주지방법원 충주지원 2014.07.24 2014고합33

살인미수등

Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not less than two years and six months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for three years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

1. The Defendant who attempted murder is a 7.5 tons truck driver of D 7.5 tons in the voice group of Chungcheongbuk-gun C, and the victim E is the victim E’s complaint.

D In early 2014, 2014, the firstman decided to change the business partner to the factory located in Jincheon-gun, Jincheon-gun, which is a member of the existing logistics transportation business, instead of the factory located in Jincheon-gun, Jincheon-gun, but the new business partner decided that the defendant will not work and that the defendant could continue to work under D.

On May 30, 2014, the Defendant, along with F, who operated the victim and its neighboring gas station, provided meals at the restaurant of the “Ji Government Unit Sheet,” which is located in the Yaeong-gun, Chungcheongnam-gun, Chungcheongnam-gun, Chungcheongnam-gun, Chungcheongnam-gun, and provided talks with the victim, the Defendant was able to say that it is difficult for the Defendant to continue the transport under D even in terms of the view of the victim while talking with the victim and the victim. However, the Defendant respondeded from the victim that “Nari” was “Nari”.

On May 30, 2014, at around 20:15, the Defendant divided the victim’s horses, and around 20:15, around 20:00, the Defendant laid off the victim’s horses in D’s accommodation with “this sindation sind,” and sind the part of the victim’s processed sind, when the sind, sind the sind part of the sind part of the sind part of the sind part of the sind part of the sind part of the sind part of the sind part.

The defendant was arrested as a flagrant offender by a police officer who was called out after receiving a report, although the victim got out of his head and got out of his house, but returned to his house and returned to his house after leaving the house.

Thus, although the defendant tried to kill the victim, the victim did not escape and did not commit the attempted crime.

유사 판례

-대전지방법원 2020.04.09 2019고단4415

-서울북부지방법원 2016.03.23 2015고단3604

-청주지방법원 2013.06.12 2013고단714

-의정부지방법원 고양지원 2014.08.14 2014고단345

-서울중앙지방법원 2018.12.13 2018고단931