logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울중앙지방법원 2016.04.05 2015가단5252863
손해배상(기)
Text

1. The Defendants jointly share KRW 30,000,000 to the Plaintiff and Defendant A with respect thereto from April 16, 2015.

Reasons

1. Facts of recognition;

A. Defendant A is a licensed real estate agent operating “C Licensed Real Estate Agent Office” in Seocheon-gu, Seocheon-gu, Seocheon-gu, and Defendant Korea Licensed Real Estate Agent Association (hereinafter “Defendant Association”) concluded a mutual aid agreement with Defendant A with the content that Defendant A will compensate for the damage within the limit of KRW 100 million where Defendant A is liable to compensate for the damage caused by intentional or negligent loss to the transaction parties in performing real estate brokerage.

B. On May 27, 2014, the Plaintiff entered into a lease agreement (hereinafter “instant lease agreement”) with Defendant A, setting forth 404 units of the multi-family house on the fourth floor E on the ground (hereinafter “instant building”) located in Seoan-gu, Seoan-gu, Seoan-gu, Seoul (hereinafter “instant building”) from May 27, 2014 to May 26, 2016, with the term of lease deposit KRW 75 million and the term of lease from May 27, 2014 to May 26, 2016.

The Plaintiff paid the lease deposit of KRW 75 million to D on the same day, and received the above KRW 404,00,000, and established a right to lease on a deposit basis for the instant building at KRW 75 million.

C. At the time of the instant lease agreement, the instant building had already been set up a right to lease on a deposit basis with the maximum debt amount of KRW 553 million in the future of the agricultural cooperative, which is the right to collateral security and KRW 57 million in the future of the F, and there was a considerable number of lessees who first leased part of the instant building and have the right to preferential reimbursement under the Housing Lease Protection Act

At the time of the instant lease agreement, Defendant A notified the Plaintiff of the maximum debt amount with respect to the right to collateral security entered in the real estate registration register of the instant building, and provided a confirmation statement of the object of intermediation, stating it.

However, with respect to chonsegwon, it is different from the fact that two chonsegwons are established on the basis of 75 million won and 50 million won, and the confirmation description of the object of brokerage is made.

arrow