1. The plaintiff's appeal against the defendants is dismissed in entirety.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

purport, purport, and.

1. The reasoning of the court's explanation concerning this case is as follows, and the plaintiff's argument of the first instance court is consistent with the reasoning of the judgment, except for adding the judgment, which is identical to that of the first instance court, as stated in the main sentence of Article 420 of the Civil Procedure Act.

[Supplementary Use]

B. As to the assertion of representation by expression under Article 126 of the Civil Act, the Plaintiff asserted the establishment of representation by expression under Article 126 of the Civil Act on the premise that C had any basic power of representation even though it is not the power of representation concerning the loan contract of this case. However, the circumstance that the Defendants issued a certificate of seal impression to C on the false end of the Incheon D shopping mall because the Defendants received a sale in lots and made a bank loan by proxy, it is difficult to recognize that C had a basic power of representation at the time of the loan contract of this case, and there is no other evidence to support this differently. Thus, the Plaintiff’s above assertion is without

2. Additional matters to be determined;

A. The plaintiff asserted that the plaintiff did not grant the power of representation to C, but the defendant Eul delivered to C a copy of the defendant's resident registration card, the copy of the defendant's family relation certificate, the defendant's family relation certificate, the driver's license of the defendant Eul, and the defendant's resident registration certificate of the defendant Eul, the copy of the defendant's resident registration certificate stating that the defendant Eul was used to purchase a vehicle for the purpose of use. Thus, the defendants are deemed to have indicated that Solomon Savings Bank has granted the power of representation to C. Thus, the defendants should bear the responsibility

B. The following circumstances, which are acknowledged by comprehensively considering the purport of the entire arguments, namely, the certificate of seal impression, is used as a method of verifying the seal use, and is merely separate from the seal use.