A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not less than eight months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment became final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

1. Around 00:50 on September 27, 2014, the Defendant driven a D body-man car in the state of alcohol alcohol concentration of about 400 meters from the day before the mutually aesthetic drinking house located in Daejeon Pungdong C to the road before Samsung Digital Frier located in the same Gu Gungdong, the same area of which is about 00 meters in front of Samsung Digital Frier located in the same Gu Gungdong, and under the influence of alcohol concentration of 0.193%.

2. Violation of the Act on the Aggravated Punishment, etc. of Specific Crimes (Death or Injury caused by Dangerous Driving) is a person engaged in driving the said D body-man car.

At around 00:50 on September 27, 2014, the Defendant, while driving the said car and driving it at around 00:0 on September 27, 2014, paragraph 1, went ahead of the mutually aesthetic road in Daejeon U.S. C with the alcohol concentration of 0.193% at an insular speed from the direction of Samsung Digital D, as it is under the influence of paragraph 1, with the speed of 0.1 degrees from the direction of Samsung Digital D, the Defendant received a right-hand part of the back-hand part of the Fststyy taxi driven in the front end of the said car by neglecting his duty of care to prevent accidents, such as thorough operation of the brake and steering gear, and accurately operating the brake and steering gear, while it is difficult to drive it normally due to influence of alcohol, while driving it is difficult to drive it normally.

Ultimately, the Defendant’s occupational negligence caused injury to the victim, such as salt, tension, etc. of the bones of necks requiring medical treatment for about two weeks.

3. On September 27, 2014, at the H District District of Daejeon Police Station, Daejeon Pream Station G, Daejeon, the Defendant: (a) revealed that his/her name was J in order to identify the fact that he/she was receiving a request for personal information from an assistant I belonging to the said District in connection with the handling of the said traffic accident; and (b) stated that his/her name was falsely disclosed to J in order to identify the fact that he/she was receiving a letter of designation; and (c) stated the report on the detection of the driver and the report on the status of the driver on his/her own name as “J”

Accordingly, the defendant is entitled to exercise his authority.