logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울중앙지방법원 2013.09.27 2013고단4858
상해등
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not less than eight months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment became final and conclusive.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

1. On May 12, 2013, the Defendant: (a) around 04:55 on May 12, 2013, the damage and damage of property: (b) the victim Party B was able to take a bath on the ground that the victim B was able to drive the victim Cro body vehicle from the shooting distance in Gangnam-gu, Gangnam-gu, Seoul Metropolitan Government, and obstructed the Defendant’s Drop vehicle proceeding; and (c) the Defendant was able to take a view of the vision and then, (d) the front light of the abovero body vehicle was damaged to KRW 5

2. The injured Defendant, at the time, at the time, and place mentioned in Paragraph 1, was placed in B and in the foregoing reasons, carried the body with windows opened on the top of the steering line of the ro body vehicle, sealed the body, and displayed B a drinking to B, but did not reach this, was faced with the victim E (I, 33 years old) face who was seated on the top of the ro body.

Accordingly, the defendant suffered damage to the victim's reputation that needs to be treated for about four weeks.

3. On May 12, 2013, at around 05:32, 2013, the Defendant violated the Road Traffic Act (Refusal of the measurement): (a) there is reasonable ground to recognize that the Defendant driven the above mountain fab in the place specified in paragraphs (1) through (2) of this Article while under the influence of alcohol, such as drinking and smelling from the slope H of the above police box at the Seoul Gangnam-gu Seoul Gangnam-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government G police station G police station at the Gangnam-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government G police station; and (b) the Defendant was under the influence of alcohol, such as drinkinging and smelling, and the Defendant did not comply with it without justifiable grounds, even though the Defendant was demanded to comply with the alcohol measurement by inserting the whole fabbb in the fab

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Each police statement of B and E;

1. A written statement of I and J;

1. An explanatory note for each control;

1. A report on the state of his/her oral statement (A);

1. Investigative report-suspect A's intention to refuse to take a drinking test;

1. A medical certificate;

1. Application of the written estimate for damage;

1. Relevant Article 366 of the Criminal Act, Article 257 (1) of the Criminal Act, Article 148-2 (1) 2 of the Road Traffic Act and Article 44 of the Road Traffic Act concerning the crime;

arrow