(영문) 서울고등법원 2019.06.18 2018누62395

beta

본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.

Text

Reasons

텍스트 조절

글꼴

크기(pt)

굵기

줄 간격

자간(%)

(영문) 서울고등법원 2019.06.18 2018누62395

수용재결취소등

Text

1. The plaintiffs' appeal against Defendant Gyeonggi-do Local Land Tribunal is dismissed.

2. The expansion from the trial.

Reasons

1. The reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance concerning the part concerning "1. Basic Facts", "2. related Acts and subordinate statutes", and "decision as to the claim against the main defendant on March 3, 190, is as follows: in addition to the part of the judgment of the court of first instance, the part concerning the claim against the main defendant on the grounds of the judgment of the court of first instance is as stated in Articles 1 through 3 (3) (including acts No. 2 through No. 15, No. 3 and No. 2 of the judgment of the court of first instance). Thus, such part shall be cited as it is in accordance

C. Foods

A. From the fourth bottom of the judgment of the court of first instance, each “this Court” in the first instance court from the third and fifth bottom shall be regarded as “the first instance court”.

B. The fifth of the judgment of the court of first instance (the table) is as follows.

Plaintiff

The appraised value of the first instance court’s appraisal amount of the objection subject to expropriation is the appraised value of the appraiser of the first instance court on the premise of “natural green belt area,” which is the specific use area of each land of this case at the time of the adjudication

[hereinafter] The appraisal of the first instance court (green). The appraisal value in the case where the numerical value applied to the “other correction of factors” of the first instance court’s appraisal (green, correction of a green belt, correction of a green belt) was modified from 1.45 to 1.48 is the appraised value.

[The appraised value of the appraiser of the first instance court, based on the premise that the specific use area of each of the lands of this case is “general residential area (class 2 and 3)” is “general residential area (class 2 and 3)”

[30,849,450 won 652,640 won 652,640,450 won 666,182,750 won 1,823,701,750 won 147,593,600 won 150,656,63,450 won 40 won 77,63,450 won 80,834,050 won 816,838,000 won 2 land of this case 146,784,754,950 won among the land of this case

2. In the part newly used in the trial, "4. Determination on the claim against the conjunctive Defendants

A. The plaintiffs' assertion 1.

참조조문

-민사소송법 제420조

-행정소송법 제8조 제2항

유사 판례

-서울중앙지방법원 2020.10.28 2020나44383

-서울고등법원 2020.11.27 2019누50634 (1)

-서울고등법원 2018.12.07 2017나2072592

-수원지방법원 2017.03.22 2015구합71182

-서울중앙지방법원 2019.07.10 2019나9438