Text
Each of the instant public prosecution against the Defendants is dismissed.
Reasons
Defendant A and B of the facts charged are the relationship between the representative committee chairperson, general secretary, and victim D(56) as the chairperson of the committee for promotion of anti-value management expenses.
A. On October 25, 2019, around 11:25, Defendant A’s assaulted Defendant A with the victim at the front corridor of the elevator of the 12th floor in Gwangjin-gu Seoul Special Metropolitan City, due to the issue of management expenses, etc., and used the victim at his arms during a dispute with the victim, and used the victim at the end, who was sprinking his sprink.
B. The Defendant injured the Defendant’s negligence in Defendant B at the same time and place as the above paragraph A, and the victim and the above A were punished for the same dispute as above, and the victim were faced with the victim and the victim was prevented from leaving the victim free of any different status.
In such cases, even though the defendant has a duty of care to prevent the victim from getting out or getting out of the victim, he/she got the victim out of the victim by his/her hand due to a tension negligence, thereby causing two fluoral damage and injury to cerebral celebines that require treatment for about two weeks.
2. Determination
(a) Crimes of non-violation of intention (Articles 260(3) and 266(2) of the Criminal Act);
B. On November 10, 2020, after the prosecution of this case, the injured person expressed his intention not to punish the Defendants.
C. Judgment dismissing public prosecution (Article 327 subparag. 6 of the Criminal Procedure Act)