1. The plaintiff's claim is dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

1. The plaintiff asserted that the defendant can have a sexual marriage with a woman who meets the plaintiff's desired conditions. The plaintiff entered into an international marriage brokerage contract with the defendant on November 18, 2012, which sets forth 11,700,000 won, and paid 20,700,000 won as expenses for international marriage, but the defendant failed to properly perform his/her obligations under the above contract, and thus, the plaintiff was unable to become a sexual marriage. The plaintiff cancelled the above international marriage brokerage contract with the defendant and sought payment of 20,700,000 won for expenses paid as compensation for damages.

2. The defendant's assertion was that the plaintiff entered into an international marriage brokerage contract with C Co., Ltd., and the defendant is not a party to the above contract.

3. The evidence presented by the Plaintiff alone cannot be recognized as a party who entered into an international marriage brokerage contract with the Plaintiff. Rather, the Plaintiff can only recognize the fact that the Plaintiff entered into an international marriage brokerage contract with C on November 18, 2012 as a party to the said international marriage brokerage contract and paid the fees therefor. Therefore, the Plaintiff’s assertion seeking compensation for damages against the Defendant on the premise that the Defendant is a party to the said international marriage brokerage contract is without merit.

Therefore, the plaintiff's claim is dismissed as it is without merit, and it is so decided as per Disposition.