logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울중앙지방법원 2018.05.25 2017나48750
임대차보증금
Text

1. The plaintiff's appeal against the defendants is dismissed in entirety.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

purport, purport, and.

Reasons

1. The reasons for the acceptance of the judgment of the court of first instance are as follows, except for the addition of the following ‘2. Additional determination' as to the assertion that the plaintiff emphasizes in the trial of the court of first instance, and therefore, they are cited in accordance with the main sentence of Article 420 of the Civil Procedure Act.

2. Additional determination

A. (1) The Plaintiff’s assertion (1) did not build an illegal building on the rooftop, etc. of the instant building; the rooftop extension portion was completely corrected on May 24, 2016; and the store and stairs of this case are not illegal buildings.

(2) The Plaintiff did not illegally extend the instant store.

B. (1) In full view of the determination (A) on the building and stairs of the rooftop of the instant building, etc. of this case, the Plaintiff: (a) leased 10 floors on around 192; (b) linked the instant store with 10 floors on around 194; (c) operated a second-story store handling second-story goods in connection with the instant store and 10 floors until 207; (d) operated a coffee specialty store from the Defendants acquired ownership of the instant store in 198 to 26; and (d) the Plaintiff continued to remove the instant store from around 1987 to the date of appraisal by the appraiser F; (d) the Plaintiff was to remove the instant 2nd floor without permission from the date of the Plaintiff’s removal to the date of the Plaintiff’s removal; and (e) the Plaintiff was to remove the instant 2nd floor without permission from the date of the Plaintiff’s removal to the date of the Plaintiff’s removal; and (e) the head of Gangnam-gu Office No. 2016. 3rd Building without permission.

arrow