logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 울산지방법원 2016.10.06 2016고단2445
성매매알선등행위의처벌에관한법률위반(성매매알선등)
Text

Defendant

A shall be punished by imprisonment with prison labor of five months, and by a fine of two million won, respectively.

Defendant

B does not pay the above fine.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

Defendant

On April 17, 2014, A was sentenced to six months of imprisonment for fraud at the Busan District Court, and the execution of the sentence was terminated on November 24 of the same year at the Busan Detention Center.

Defendant

A had employed women of sexual traffic with foreign nationality in Ulsan B, and had a overall control over the business of arranging sexual traffic, such as recruiting male sexual traffic using app "D", which is a smartphone, etc., and Defendant B, under the direction of Defendant A, had the women of sexual traffic take the commercial sex acts using the vehicle to the place of sexual traffic, and had them take charge of the role of taking the commercial sex acts again after the completion of sexual traffic.

From the beginning of June 2016 to the end of June 16 of the same month, the Defendants posted a letter related to sexual traffic using the aforementioned “D”, etc., and received 110,000 won in return for sexual traffic from the male sexual traffic who reported and contacted the above letter, and had the said female sexual traffic engage in sexual traffic.

As a result, the Defendants conspired to arrange sexual traffic for business purposes as above.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendants’ legal statement

1. Each police suspect interrogation protocol of E, C, or F;

1. Photographss of the control site and e-mail photographs;

1. Previous offense: Criminal records, investigation reports (Attachment of judgment), and application of Acts and subordinate statutes concerning personal confinement;

1. Articles 19 (2) 1 and 30 of the Act on the Punishment of Acts of Arranging Sexual Traffic concerning facts constituting an offense;

1. Article 35 of the Criminal Act Aggravation of repeated crimes (Defendant A);

1. The reason for the sentencing of Articles 70(1) and 69(2) of the Criminal Act for the detention in the workhouse [the scope of recommendations] is that there is no basic area (6 to 1 year and 4 months) [the decision of sentence] [the person who is a special person] of the basic area (6 to 1 year and 4 months] (the decision of sentence] [the defendant A] commits the crime without being able to do so during the repeated period, and commits the crime of arranging the sexual traffic by using high radio waves such as Internet or social relation network services such as D, etc.

arrow