logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 제주지방법원 2014.07.11 2014고단724
상해등
Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 2,000,000.

When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

The Defendant operated an entertainment business with the trade name “D” in Seocho-si, and the victim E (V) who worked for the said business from September 2, 2012 to July 2013 as an employee of the said business, filed an application for wage payment with the Jeju Regional Labor Office for the Defendant on the ground that the victim E (V) was not paid the wage of KRW 15 million, and the Seopo Police Office filed a complaint with the Jeju Regional Labor Office on December 11, 2013, to issue an order for prohibition of access to the victim on the ground that he/she was not paid the wage of KRW 15 million.

1. At around 19:20 on January 27, 2014, the injured Defendant inflicted injury on the victim, such as f in Seoposi F, “G” restaurant in which the victim works as an employee, and that the victim, who entered the Defendant, was aware of no access order, or no longer finite, so that the victim would be reported to the police if he was inside, she would be able to do so.” The victim’s breath by hand, and booming the victim’s neck with the victim’s free entrance, and pushing the victim with the entrance of the above restaurant entrance, thereby causing injury.

2. At the time and place specified in Paragraph 1, the Defendant interfered with the business, as mentioned above, led to a situation in which customers who assaulted E to avoid disturbance by avoiding disturbance and who were eating at the same place get out of the restaurant and are unable to get customers off and scattered in the restaurant, thereby interfering with the victim’s restaurant business by failing to comply with the request of the victim H, who was the operator, for about 35 minutes even though he requested the eviction, thereby obstructing the victim’s restaurant business.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Each police statement of E and H;

1. Application of relevant photographs and diagnostic notes (E)-related Acts and subordinate statutes;

1. Relevant provisions of the Criminal Act and the choice of punishment for the crime: Articles 257 (1) and 314 (1) of the Criminal Act;

1. Aggravation of concurrent crimes: former part of Article 37, Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the Criminal Act;

1. Attraction of a workhouse: Articles 70 and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act;

1. Provisional payment order:

arrow