logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울행정법원 2018.05.03 2017구합69243
종합소득세경정거부처분취소
Text

1. The plaintiff's claim is dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

Reasons

1. Details of the disposition;

A. The Plaintiff, from August 2004 to August 2012, 2012, was holding as the representative director of B (hereinafter “B”) and held 51.5% of the shares issued, and transferred the management right of B to C (hereinafter “C”) with the shares held above around August 2012.

B. On August 13, 2014, the Plaintiff, while holding office as the representative director B, was sentenced to a suspended sentence of three years on the grounds that he embezzled total amount of KRW 1,321,106,640 (hereinafter “the instant embezzlement”) as follows, and was sentenced to a suspended sentence of three years on August 13, 2014 ( Daejeon District Court Decision 2013Gohap293), and around that time the said judgment (hereinafter “instant criminal judgment”) became final and conclusive.

① Around November 2011, the Plaintiff, who pretended to be paid to D as a certified judicial scrivener, concluded a false business agreement and advisory agreement with D and embezzled KRW 33,00,000, which is the victim B as if the said agreement were performed.

② The Plaintiff, who pretended to pay advisory fees to E (hereinafter referred to as “E”) and F (hereinafter referred to as “F”), has been assisted by embezzlement (hereinafter referred to as “instant facts of crime 1,” and the part related to F (hereinafter referred to as “instant facts of crime 2”) by receiving information from H who worked as a director in G to participate in combined loans of savings banks.

Meanwhile, around December 29, 2006, H obtained a loan of KRW 430,000,000 from B in the name of Company I (hereinafter “I”) and did not repay the remainder by September 2010.

The Plaintiff demanded H to repay the remainder to the effect that “I was able to assist in the B business, but it was not too much.” A around 201, the Plaintiff entered into a false financial advisory consignment agreement with E operated by the J, a member of H, and entered into a false financial advisory consignment agreement with B as if B implemented the said agreement.

arrow