beta
Text
A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for four months.
However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for one year from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.
Reasons
Punishment of the crime
Defendant C is a person who actually offered land in the name of Defendant C and Defendant F as security and received a loan from the said bank in order to repay the debt due to the business failure of the said bank. However, Defendant C is a substantial debtor for the loans of the said bank, while Defendant C is a person who actually provided land in the name of Defendant C’s apartment and Defendant F, which is in fact owned by Defendant C, as security.
Criminal facts
1. On November 7, 2006, the Defendant C, who was exempted from compulsory execution, provided E with the right to collateral security, which is KRW 260 million (the maximum debt amount 200,000,000,000 won) for the Goyang-gu G Apartment-gu G Apartment-gu 103, 403, and 200,000 won with the Defendant’s wife around December 27, 2006, the Defendant C borrowed 200,000,000 won from the said bank by providing the said bank with G apartment 103,403, and the Defendant’s shape-gu H and I land as joint collateral, as a maximum debt amount of KRW 65,00,00 from the said bank. On August 21, 2009, the Defendant borrowed 20,000,000 won from the said bank separately from the said right to collateral security.
However, from May 2010, Defendant C was unable to repay loans under the name of E normally, and the above bank, the creditor, applied for a voluntary auction on August 26, 2010 and rendered a voluntary decision to commence auction as to G apartment No. 103 403, G apartment around 2010, and the auction procedure was in progress.
Defendant
C The purpose of evading compulsory execution around June 2010 is to conclude a false lease agreement with the most lessee even though Defendant A, the land owner, did not actually reside without paying the lease deposit for G apartment 103 403 Ga 403 Ga 103 Ga 103 Ga 103 Ga, and as the content of the lease agreement, the most lessee, paid the lease deposit, and prepared a false lease agreement as if he had resided in G apartment 103 403 Ga 103 Ga 403. Based on this, the above auction court