beta
Text
As to the first crime (2018 Godan4360), the defendant is punished by imprisonment with prison labor for 6 months, and the second and third crimes (2019 Godan1941) of the decision.
Reasons
Punishment of the crime
On April 23, 2015, the Defendant was sentenced to two years of imprisonment for fraud at the Incheon District Court for one year of probation, and was sentenced to six months of imprisonment for fraud at the Incheon District Court on March 24, 2016. On March 24, 2016, the period of parole was expired on March 30, 2017 and the period of parole was expired on April 28, 2017. On April 5, 2018, the Defendant was released on ten months of imprisonment with prison labor at the Incheon District Court for fraud, etc. and dismissed on September 14, 2018, and the said sentence became final and conclusive as is.
"2018 Highest 4360"
1. Around June 6, 2017, the defrauded made a false statement to the effect that “the Defendant would return the pre-contract to cancel the pre-contract” by phoneing the victim C, the owner of the pention, at the Defendant’s house located in Incheon Strengthening-gun, and the victim C deposited KRW 150,000 in the name of the Defendant (E).
However, the defendant did not have the right to return the pre-contract because he did not make the pre-contract to the pension.
Along with this, the Defendant received a total of 2,982,00 won by deceiving the victims over 10 times, such as the attached list of crimes, and attempted to acquire money by deceiving the victim F, and attempted to acquire money by deceiving the victim F.
"2019 Highest 1941"
2. Fraud;
A. On November 14, 2018, the Defendant made a false statement to the effect that “the Defendant against the victim G, who is the owner of the Gangseo-si Hththn Si Hththy, made a promise for pention by telephone, from December 30, 2018 to December 31, 201 of the same month, would instead cancel the promise, and instead, would cause the cancellation of the promise, so that the Defendant would transfer KRW 50,000 to KRW 850,000,000.”
However, in fact, the defendant did not live together with the above-mentioned contractor, and there was no right to receive refund since he did not have promised to pay the above-mentioned pension.
Ultimately, the defendant deceivings the victim as above, and then is 850,000 won from the D account (Account Number) used by the defendant on the same day from the victim under the name of refund.