logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 대전지방법원 2020.10.28 2020가단11039
건물전체명도 등
Text

1. The defendant shall be the plaintiff.

(a) Of the real estate listed in the separate sheet, the indication of the attached sheet A, B, C, D, E, F, A.

Reasons

1. Indication of claim;

A. On January 21, 2017, the Plaintiff entered into a lease agreement with the Defendant on the real estate listed in the first paragraph (a) of the Disposition No. 1 (hereinafter “instant real estate”) by setting the lease deposit of KRW 10 million and KRW 650,000 (payment at the end of each month) as the monthly rent of KRW 10,000,000.

(hereinafter “instant lease agreement”). B.

However, the Defendant did not pay two or more vehicles, and the Plaintiff notified the Defendant of the termination of the instant lease agreement on June 10, 2020.

C. Therefore, as the instant lease contract was terminated, the Defendant is obligated to deliver the instant real estate, and to pay unjust enrichment equivalent to the rent calculated by the ratio of KRW 3.5 million from July 1, 2020 to the delivery date of the instant real estate, which is the rent of KRW 3.5 million, which was unpaid until June 30, 2020 and the rent of KRW 6.5 million from July 1, 2020.

2. Judgment by publication of the basis (Article 208 (3) 3 of the Civil Procedure Act).

arrow