The plaintiff's appeal against the defendants is dismissed in entirety.

Expenses for appeal shall be borne by the plaintiff.

purport, purport, and.

The reasoning for this Court’s explanation is as follows, except for adding the following to the right side of “three parallels” below the fifth day of the judgment of the court of first instance, and therefore, it is identical to the reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance. Therefore, this Court cites it as it is in accordance with the main sentence of Article 420 of the Civil Procedure Act (see, e.g., Supreme Court’s assertion in

A) Article 7-359 of the former Act provides that the registration of a site ownership shall be made ex officio in the item column of the corresponding section of the registration site of the land which is the object of the site ownership if the registration officer registers a site ownership in the title section of the registration site of a building. Pursuant to the above provision, if the registration officer registers the purport that a site ownership is a site ownership ex officio in the registration site of the land which is the object of the site ownership, and enters the indication of a right to a site ownership in the registration site of the land which is the object of the site ownership into "all co-owners' shares except 3.83/1640 of the shares of "A" and 358.68/1640 of the shares of "all co-owners' shares" by mistake that the registration officer shall enter the indication of a right to a site ownership in the registration site of the land which is the object of the site ownership, the registration officer shall correct ex officio as "the co-ownership share in whole except 304.85/1640 of the shares of the above."

The judgment of the court of first instance with the same conclusion is just, and the plaintiff's appeal against the defendants is without merit, and all of the appeals are dismissed.