The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

1. The main point of the grounds for appeal is that the lower court’s punishment (five million won penalty) is too unreasonable.

2. Determination

A. It is recognized that the Defendant, who led to the instant crime, led to the confession of and reflect on the instant crime, and the economic situation is difficult.

B. However, in full view of the following circumstances: (a) the Defendant was punished twice as a violation of the Guarantee of Automobile Compensation Act; (b) the Defendant did not agree with the victims; and (c) did not recover damage; and (d) the Defendant’s age, details of the crime; and (b) other circumstances that form the conditions for sentencing specified in the instant pleadings, such as the circumstances after the crime, etc., even if considering the favorable circumstances in the Defendant, the lower court’s sentence is too unreasonable,

Therefore, the above argument by the Defendant is without merit (the Defendant asserted that prior vehicles were parked, but at the time of the police investigation, the Defendant was not present at all at the time of the police investigation, the Defendant received D’s vehicle and received D’s vehicle and did not at all assert that D’s vehicle was parked in F’s vehicle, and D’s vehicle was parked in F’s vehicle, and ③ the Skid mark due to sudden stop at the site does not remain at the site. In light of the fact that D’s vehicle was parked in F’s vehicle.

As it is difficult to see the defendant's above assertion is without merit) 3. Thus, the defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act, since the defendant's appeal is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.