logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 부산지방법원 2017.07.20 2015구합23343
폐쇄명령처분취소
Text

1. The plaintiff's claim is dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

Reasons

1. Details of the disposition;

A. The Plaintiff, with the trade name “B” from December 5, 1972, established and operated one Dong (1,650 square meters, 215 square meters in factory construction area, 40 cubic meters in production facilities; hereinafter “first factory”) on the ground of plastic tape manufacturing business, etc. from the Busan Young-gu, Do, Busan. The Plaintiff completed the registration of a factory on April 21, 1985.

B. On January 29, 1997, the Plaintiff obtained permission for the installation of noise emission facilities from the Defendant as to the 40HP 1 unit, the name of the business place B and the location of the location of the business place C, Young-gu, Busan.

While closing the above 40HP 1 unit, the Plaintiff extended a total of 2HP (1.5kW), 3, 5HP (3.75kW), 8, 7.5 HP (5.65kW) 2, 15HP (11.25kW) 1, and 76HP (57kW) 76kW. The Defendant accepted the report on the alteration of the noise emission facilities on January 19, 2009.

C. On January 14, 2009, the Plaintiff filed a report on the installation of air emission facilities with respect to the first period (name B, location B, Busan Young-gu C) of the building facilities (21.6 cubic meters) with the Defendant. On November 27, 2012, the Plaintiff filed a report on the installation of air emission facilities for the first period of the building facilities (33.14 cubic meters) additionally installed (33.14 cubic meters).

On April 6, 2015, public officials belonging to the Young-do Office of Busan Metropolitan City (hereinafter “Yado Office”) found that the construction facilities (39.02 cubic meters) of air emission facilities and the compressed-gu Office of Busan Metropolitan City (15HP 1, 2HP 3, 5HP 8, 7.5 HP 2, 15 HP 1, 15 HP 2, and 15 HP 1, in addition to the air emission facilities reported to the first factory and the permitted noise emission facilities, as a result of on-site inspections on the Plaintiff’s first factory, etc.

(hereinafter the above air emission facilities and noise emission facilities are combined with “No. 1 emission facilities” (hereinafter referred to as “the above air emission facilities”).

The Defendant notified the Plaintiff that the hearing will be held on May 7, 2015, along with a prior notice of disposition to issue an order to close down non-reported standby emission facilities and unauthorized noise emission facilities, and held on the date above.

arrow