logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울중앙지방법원 2018.01.26 2017고정1043
점유이탈물횡령
Text

The defendant shall be innocent.

Reasons

1. The Defendant, on January 11, 2017, embezzled the above wallets on his own thought, instead of taking necessary procedures, such as acquiring a driver’s license lost by the victim C, credit card, cash, etc., and returning it to the victim, within the direction of the Party that arrived at the station in the Eastern Station Cultural Park Station of Seoul subway 4, Seoul subway around 16:08.

2. Determination

A. The Defendant, from an investigative agency to this court, denies the crime, while having not committed the crime on the ground that the Defendant did not follow the Defendant’s walling within the same period.

B. According to the evidence duly adopted and examined by the court, the following facts can be acknowledged.

(1) Starting from the Dongdaemun Station and taking part in the East Station cultural park station (hereinafter “cultural park station”), the victim took part in the front line of Seoul subway No. 4, which was located in the East Station (hereinafter “cultural park station”) at the front line of Seoul subway No. 4, on the direction of the seat on which the victim left and took part in the wing line.

D has been witnessed even when the offender was placed in a main unit of the above wall, and the offender was shot around him.

2) D Recognizing that the victim who was once set up in the cultural park station had been set up in the previous dynamics and was found to have been found to have been tried by the victim.

In order to help the victim find a lock, the police officer called the victim and the defendant was identified as the criminal offender by putting the CCTV that was installed on the top of the top-down radar near the entrance set up by the victim and the criminal in the cultural park station in the cultural park station [4) [the cultural park E/S4 commercial CCTV (S4 commercial CCTV), the investigation records of 14 pages CCTV-cap-caping photographs] from the CCTV that was installed on the top of the top-down radar near the entrance set up by the victim and the criminal. In addition, the defendant was identified as the criminal offender, with the conviction that the defendant was identical to 40 to 50 large male, who weared the sponing sponing sponing spon which is the front of the offender's appearance.

3) D in this Court, ① in the service room at the time, “the place at which us had left is too end.”

arrow