1. The defendant (Counterclaim plaintiff)'s appeal is dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal are assessed against the Defendant-Counterclaim Plaintiff.

purport, purport, and.

1. The reasoning of the court's explanation concerning this case is as stated in the reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance, except for adding each of the following additional items to the judgment of the court of first instance. Thus, it is citing it as it is by the main text of Article 420 of the Civil Procedure Act

[Additional Matters] The second 7th 17th 17th 17th 17th 7th 7th 7th 201 additional part of the loan (the defendant prepared and delivered a certificate of loan of KRW 40 million to D on March 30, 201. The defendant seems to have discharged the above loan obligation by transferring the money borrowed from the network E to D's account) 8th 20th 20th 8th 20th 7th 201. The defendant argued that the above loan of KRW 105 million was omitted in the first 1th 5th 1th 200,000,000 won among the loan that the defendant repaid to E, but the above loan of KRW 105 million was separately appropriated to the defendant on March 31, 201 200,000,000 from the above loan of KRW 1601,500,000,000 for the defendant's loan of KRW 15 million.

Therefore, the defendant's above assertion is without merit.

2. In conclusion, the judgment of the first instance is legitimate, and the defendant's appeal is dismissed as it is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.