logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 수원지방법원안양지원 2016.10.06 2015가단22357
손해배상(기)
Text

1. The Defendant is due to sale and purchase on November 14, 2012 with respect to each real estate listed in the separate list from the Plaintiff.

Reasons

On November 14, 2012, the Plaintiff entered into a contract with the Defendant to sell each real estate listed in the separate sheet of real estate (hereinafter “each of the instant real estate”) with the following content (hereinafter “instant contract”).

After November 14, 2012, the remainder of the down payment of KRW 830 million, KRW 30 million, KRW 320 million, KRW 320 million, KRW 320 million, KRW 480 million, and KRW 480 million, and KRW 14,000,000 (in lieu of accepting the obligation to repay the lease deposit of KRW 30 million, KRW 30 million), and KRW 320 million, KRW 14, 2012, KRW 480,000, and KRW 400,000 (in lieu of accepting the obligation to repay the lease deposit of KRW 30,00,00,00,000, KRW 830,000,000, and KRW 300,000,000,000,000; and the registration of transfer of ownership with the Defendant’s waiver of the down payment of KRW 10,000,000,00.

On March 14, 2012, the date of issue, the place of payment, and the place of payment at the par value of the date of issuance. On March 14, 2013, the Defendant, on November 14, 2012, issued a promissory note with the following contents in order to guarantee the payment of the said comprehensive transfer price, and, on November 14, 2012, issued a promissory note No. 386, a certified notary public with no objection (No. 386, 2012), and issued the Plaintiff a promissory note No. 386, which is accepted by the Defendant without any objection even if he/she is subject to compulsory execution

The Plaintiff issued to the Defendant all necessary documents for the registration of ownership transfer of each real estate of this case immediately after the sales contract of this case.

From February 2013, the defendant did not pay interest on the above loans from around February 2013 and imposed on the real estate in this case.

arrow