Text
A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for one year.
Reasons
Punishment of the crime
On June 10, 2015, the Defendant was sentenced to a suspended sentence of three years for a violation of the Punishment of Tax Evaders in Seoul Southern District Court on one year and six months, and the above judgment was finalized on the 18th of the same month. On August 20, 2015, the Defendant was sentenced to a suspended sentence of three years for one year for a violation of the Grain Management Act in the Hayang Branch of the Mayang District Court, which was sentenced to a suspended sentence of three years for a violation of the Grain Management Act.
The Defendant, a person who operated F Co., Ltd. (hereinafter referred to as “F”) for agricultural company that collects, distributes, sells, etc. agricultural products with its head office located in the Gyeonggi-si, and its head office located in Chungcheongnam-si, Chungcheongnam-si, Chungcheongnam-si, Chungcheongnam-si, and has been engaged in agricultural transaction with the victim G.
On May 2012, the Defendant: (a) filed a claim suit against the issuer of the Promissory Notes (such as the Promissory Notes) with a face value of KRW 100 million which is KRW 45 million with H M Et I at KRW 100 million with a face value of KRW 30 million with a face value of KRW 45 million with a face value of KRW 45 million with a face value of KRW 30 million with a face value of KRW 235 million with a face value of the Promissory Notes (hereinafter “instant Promissory Notes”); (b) filed the claim suit under the F’s name, and (c) received a request from the victim to return the winning amount to the victim, and accepted the claim.
Accordingly, on August 28, 2012, F filed a lawsuit claiming the payment of promissory notes against the issuer I and one other at the Sung-nam District Court Sung-nam District Court. On February 27, 2014, the Defendants jointly and severally paid F 235 million won to F, and on April 9, 2014, according to the settlement decision, F obtained a collection order and executed the provisional seizure and collection order to six financial institutions, including N, the debtor N and the third debtor non-credit card (owner), to transfer the provisional seizure to F, from the Seoul Central District Court.
Since then, the Defendant, as a result of the execution of a seizure and collection order, issued a new card (owner) around April 16, 2014, KRW 50 million from Samsung Card (owner), KRW 10 million from Hyundai Card (owner), KRW 55 million from Hyundai Card, and April 17, 2014.